Alan Gross: Castro's prisoner
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.
Archives
Recent Comments

    How will Cuba get off the state-sponsored terrorism list?

    How will Cuba get off the state-sponsored terrorism list?
    By Thomas Sparrow
    BBC Mundo

    The negotiations have ended with a promise to meet again this year

    Since March 1982, Cuba has been on a US state department list of
    countries that “have repeatedly provided support for acts of
    international terrorism”.

    The list is short – Iran, Sudan, Syria and Cuba.

    The US believes Cuba has long provided a safe haven for members of the
    Basque separatist group ETA and Colombia’s Farc guerrilla group,
    according to its 2013 Report on Terrorism.

    But the Caribbean nation has frequently rejected its presence on the
    list, describing it as unfounded.

    And now officials are stressing that it should be removed if
    negotiations with the United States are to move forward.

    “We expressed the view that it would be difficult to explain that
    diplomatic relations have been resumed while Cuba is still unjustly
    listed as a state sponsor of international terrorism,” said Josefina
    Vidal, who has represented the Cuban government in the negotiations.

    The US government has said it has begun an intelligence review in order
    to evaluate whether Cuba can be removed from the list.

    But it has described the matter as a separate issue to the opening of
    embassies, which has been Washington’s main objective for these initial
    talks.

    “This is the most relevant issue on the immediate agenda,” says Arturo
    Lopez Levy, a scholar on Cuban issues at the University of Denver, in
    Colorado.

    “Cuba has never accepted the US authority to include Cuba in a
    unilateral list of countries that sponsor terrorism,” he tells the BBC.

    “It has even said that it should never have been on that list, so it
    doesn’t need to formally co-operate when it comes to being taken off it.”

    The state department has sanctioned the four countries on the list by
    banning certain exports or restricting US foreign assistance.

    In Cuba’s case, this does not change much, because the country is
    already affected by the embargo.

    But unlike the embargo, which can only be lifted through an act of
    Congress, this decision is ultimately in the president’s hands.

    Mr Obama has used his executive authority to reduce the power of the
    embargo wherever he has been able to, and he recently unveiled a series
    of new travel and trade rules between the two countries.

    Now it is possible that his next executive actions could include
    removing Cuba from the list.

    He has asked the state department to complete a review process and
    present a recommendation to him within six months.

    Once he receives it, he would have to submit a report to Congress 45
    days before the new decision would take effect.

    That report would have to first ensure that Cuba had not provided any
    support for international terrorism in the preceding six months, and
    then offer guarantees that it would not do so in the future.

    Regarding the first element, even the state department has acknowledged
    that Cuba has made progress.

    In its 2013 Report on Terrorism it highlighted how Cuba’s links to ETA
    have become more distant and how it has been hosting negotiations
    between Colombia’s government and Farc rebels.

    It also mentioned how there has been no indication that the Cuban
    government “provided weapons or paramilitary training to terrorist groups”.

    The Caribbean island has remained on the list despite these actions,
    mainly because of political considerations, according to Geoff Thale, a
    Cuba analyst at the Washington Office on Latin America (Wola).

    “With Alan Gross still in prison, the US administration wasn’t willing
    to pay the political price of taking Cuba off the list,” Mr Thale told
    the BBC.

    With many of those political considerations out of the way, the main
    issue lies in finding a way for Cuba to guarantee that it will not
    support any acts of terrorism in the future.

    “The diplomatic challenge is to find a formula that will enable Cuba to
    hand the United States information regarding those guarantees,” says
    Arturo Lopez Levy.

    If the two countries co-operate and Washington takes Cuba off the list,
    this will have concrete effects on the Caribbean island.

    “Foreign banks, even when engaged in perfectly legal transactions with
    Cuba, are wary of getting investigated by the treasury department,” says
    Mr Thale.

    As the United States and Cuba pledge to normalise diplomatic ties, the
    BBC looks back at the relationship between the two countries through the
    decades.
    “And so it will ease that burden, and that will be helpful for them, but
    it won’t actually change any financial sanctions directed at Cuba.”

    Lopez Levy adds that it would be “another nail in the coffin of the
    embargo” and it would affect the “logic of Cuba as an enemy of the
    United States”.

    For the moment, though, Cuba remains on the list and the state
    department has preferred not to anticipate the outcome of its ongoing
    investigation.

    Source: BBC News – How will Cuba get off the state-sponsored terrorism
    list? –