Alan Gross: Castro's prisoner
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.
Recent Comments

    Alan Gross’s Wife on US-Cuba Impasse

    Alan Gross’s Wife on US-Cuba Impasse
    February 6, 2014
    By Tracey Eaton*

    HAVANA TIMES — Forget South Florida politics, negotiate with the Cubans
    and find a way to bring Alan Gross home. That’s what Judy Gross told me
    earlier this week.

    Her husband has been in jail in Cuba for more than four years – 1,521
    days, to be exact. And she said she is angry and frustrated that the
    U.S. government doesn’t do more to secure his freedom. She said:

    ”…It’s been way, way too long and our government is responsible for
    Alan being there and I just can’t believe that they can’t do anything
    about it. Sometimes I wonder if there’s some kind of motive behind it.
    Not to be paranoid, but it just blows my mind still that they don’t even
    mention Alan’s name.”

    Gross reiterated her call to President Obama to step up efforts to free
    her husband. Asked about Secretary John Kerry’s recent request that the
    Vatican help out, Gross said:

    ”…it’s really Secretary Kerry’s job to free Alan, not the Pope. So
    instead of asking the Pope, I think Secretary Kerry should work on it.”

    Judy Gross also faulted the Cuban government for jailing her husband in
    2009, but expressed admiration for the Cuban people.

    ”I really love Cuba and I hope to keep going back under different
    circumstances. The people are so friendly…”

    A full transcript of our interview is below:

    Tracey Eaton: How are you?

    Judy Gross: I’m doing OK, just you know living life every day and trying
    to do the best I can.

    TE: After your last visit to Cuba, do you see any hopeful signs? Did you
    learn anything new that gives you reason to be more optimistic?

    JG: You know, I was just there three weeks ago. The thing that was
    positive, I think, and that was different is that just coincidentally
    Scott (Gilbert, the Gross family lawyer) and I were there at the same
    time as the State Department delegation for the migration talks, so they
    got to meet with Alan and that’s the first time, other than the
    Interests Section in Cuba, that’s really the first time somebody from
    State has met with him.

    So if there was anything positive I think it was very good for them to
    see Alan and to talk to him and to see what his daily life is like and
    to hear his issues and how he’s feeling. It put something real to the
    person, to get to really see him face to face.

    TE: Do you know which officials met with him?

    JG: I don’t remember all of them. The usual people from the Interests
    Section in Cuba, you know, the chief of mission, and the delegation was
    headed up by (Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere
    Affairs Edward) “Alex” Lee from State here in Washington.

    TE: Did they give you any of their impressions after that visit?

    JG: I think they were humbled. I think they were very humbled by talking
    to Alan and seeing him and hopefully, you know, that will make some
    difference. We’ll just have to see.

    TE: That must have been an emotional meeting in a way because I’ll bet
    Alan is extremely frustrated and angry and wants to talk to somebody.
    What was his reaction to the meeting?

    JG: Pretty much everything you just said. He was angry. He was
    frustrated. I mean, he expressed those things I should say – anger and
    frustration and a lot of sadness and grief and lots of other adjectives
    that he expressed.

    There’s a lot pent up in somebody when they’re incarcerated for four
    years and it’s basically in a one-room cell.

    TE: I watched several of your interviews on CNN and other media outlets
    and you had talked about the need for President Obama to be personally
    engaged. Do you feel that now he is personally engaged or is intervening?

    JG: I have not heard anything and so I can’t say that that situation has
    changed. It might have and I just don’t know that it has, but as far as
    I know, and as far as I feel, he still needs to get, the White House
    needs to get involved in this. It’s very upsetting obviously that they

    TE: Yeah, I’ll bet. I wonder has your opinion of the U.S. government
    changed any since this whole ordeal began?

    JG: (laughs) I think that I have gained a lot of perspective on
    bureaucracy and how big this government really is and how bureaucratic
    it really is and (it’s) kind of difficult to mire through it. But as far
    as the government, no, really it hasn’t changed.

    I feel angry. I feel angry that there’s no response from the government
    who sent Alan there to begin with. It was a U.S. government project,
    obviously. And I feel angry that there’s been no communication,
    especially because he was working as a U.S. government contractor. But I
    don’t think I feel differently about the government.

    I still believe in our political system.

    TE: I understand. So it’s not as if U.S. officials are reaching out to
    you regularly and keeping touch with you and giving you updates or
    anything like that?

    JG: That’s right.

    TE: OK. And can you describe the experience of having to sue the U.S.
    government and Alan’s employer to try to obtain some sort of compensation?

    JG: I was never there at any of the meetings, the litigation or any of
    that, so I personally can’t describe any feelings of actually being
    there. But it was very frustrating because it took so long and I was
    very scared to be honest with you. I didn’t know how I was going to
    live. I mean I would have had to move into like a, what do you call it,
    not even a one-bedroom apartment. A very, very tiny apartment and live
    very carefully. And I still am afraid of my future financially. So that
    was frustrating that that all took so long. And I’m just glad it got

    TE: I don’t know the latest. Isn’t there an appeal in the lawsuit
    against the U.S. government?

    JG: That’s something because there’s still litigation that I can’t
    really talk about.

    TE: I was a little surprised, I read a few days ago that U.S. lawmakers
    had defunded USAID programs in Cuba in their newest budget.

    JG: Really? I hadn’t heard that. That’s something I would have thought I
    would have known about.

    TE: It hasn’t really gotten much notice at all. I just wondered if you
    know if your husband’s case somehow influenced that decision?

    JG: I can’t speak on that. I’m going to have to find out.

    TE: It’s been voted on and approved.

    JG: Holy cow! How would (Sen. Robert) Menéndez allow that to happen? I’m
    very surprised that I didn’t hear that.

    TE: Do you think release of Fernando González (a Cuban Five member set
    to be freed on Feb. 27) will have any impact on the case?

    JG: No, I don’t. I don’t think that will have any change on anything.

    TE: What about Secretary of State Kerry reportedly asking the Vatican to
    help win Alan’s release. Any idea whether that might help in the
    process? Have you heard anything about that?

    JG: I’m very skeptical about that. We’ve had Vatican contact in the past
    with the former Pope and I just, you know, I would love to be wrong but
    I don’t think anything’s going to come from that. And it’s really
    Secretary Kerry’s job to free Alan, not the Pope. So instead of asking
    the Pope, I think Secretary Kerry should work on it.

    TE: Good point. And altogether you’ve been to Cuba how many times?

    JG: I think this was my sixth trip.

    TE: Wow, lots of trips.

    JG: Lots of years.

    TE: I read that the Cuban foreign minister told you the Cubans were
    waiting for U.S. to send an American envoy who could start negotiations
    with the Cubans. Did you get that same impression the last time?

    JG: The foreign minister is Bruno Rodríguez. I met with him the last
    time, not this most recent trip. In this most recent trip, we were told
    that Cuba has reached out via letter asking the United States to contact
    them so they can start talking, and they said there were no preconditions.

    TE: And during your trips to Cuba I imagine your focus is like a laser
    on Alan, but have you gotten any impression of the country or any
    opinion on the country itself?

    JG: I wish I could get out of Havana. I never got past Havana. I really
    love Cuba and I hope to keep going back under different circumstances.
    The people are so friendly and with all the difficulties they have, and
    they certainly have plenty of difficulties, they seem to just maintain
    great mood. This is what I see from observing. I don’t have any personal
    relationships with anyone. But they just, the people that I have met
    they have been very gracious and very kind and I love the feel of the
    city. I look and try to think what it was like before the infrastructure
    started falling apart. I love the music. I love the culture.

    TE: If time machines existed, I’d like to go back to 1958 to see what
    that was like.

    JG: (laughs) I look forward to the day when really the Americans can
    share music with Cubans. That’s what I look forward to.

    TE: That will be great.

    Some lawmakers say Cuba should make concessions to the U.S. – improving
    basic human rights, for instance – before we even talk with Cuba about
    Alan. What’s your opinion of that?

    JG: My opinion is that they need to sit down and negotiate whatever they
    want to negotiate. I don’t want to get involved in the political issues
    of Cuba. Our lawmakers- I think everything should be on the table. I
    don’t think our lawmakers should make any preconditions, let’s put it
    that way.

    TE: I just have one more question and it’s very open-ended. I wonder, is
    there anything that journalists haven’t asked you that you wish they
    would have? Is there something that you would like to cover or would
    like people to know?

    JG: Well, that’s a question I’ve never been asked. That’s a tough one. I
    just want to reiterate my frustration I would have to say with both
    governments. I can’t just say the U.S. government obviously. The Cuban
    government is very much at fault, too, for arresting Alan to begin with.
    But you know it’s been way, way too long and our government is
    responsible for Alan being there and I just can’t believe that they
    can’t do anything about it. Sometimes I wonder if there’s some kind of
    motive behind it. Not to be paranoid, but it just blows my mind still
    that they don’t even mention Alan’s name.

    TE: I’ve thought it strange, too. We’re supposedly the most powerful
    government on earth. It’s occurred to me – could they take him by force?
    Although then I imagine that could endanger Alan. It’s just hard to
    believe we can’t do more.

    JG: I think politics rears its ugly head in a way. You might want to
    find out more about the influence that Menéndez has and (U.S. Rep.)
    Ileana (Ros-Lehtinen) and (Sen. Marco) Rubio, but especially Sen.
    Menéndez. I honestly think that he has a lot of power in this whole
    thing. I could be wrong, but I can’t think of any other reason why the
    president won’t speak about it.

    TE: It’s great to talk to you.

    JG: OK, take care.
    (*) Visit Tracey Eaton’s blog Alongthemalecon.

    Source: Alan Gross’s Wife on US-Cuba Impasse – Havana –