Alan Gross: Castro's prisoner
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.
Recent Comments

    Why can’t we vacation in Cuba? Because it’s a terror state

    Why can’t we vacation in Cuba? Because it’s a terror state
    By: Al Cardenas
    4/30/2013 02:28 PM

    As an attendee at this weekend’s White House Correspondents Dinner, it
    struck me that I agree with the president. At least on one issue. Rapper
    Jay-Z’s recent decision to visit Cuba is a problem. Jay-Z and wife
    Beyoncé traveled to Cuba to celebrate (in their words) their fifth
    wedding anniversary in spite of a U.S. tourist ban. Many of my friends
    on the right ask: “Why can’t Americans travel to any country they wish
    to? Why can we go as tourists to China but not Cuba?”

    It’s for the same reason we can’t go to North Korea or Iran: Cuba is a
    terrorist nation. China didn’t seize our assets or deploy nuclear
    weapons 90 miles off our coast. Cuba continues to actively promote
    hostility towards the U.S. in our hemisphere and our tourist dollars
    help prop up the Castro regime and prolong the agony of 11 million people.

    U.S.-Cuba relations since 1959 have gone from strained to severe, to the
    closest we have ever come to nuclear Armageddon. Its always included
    provocations on Castro’s end of one degree or another and periodic
    rapprochements have been a colossal waste of time — except for an
    immigration accord which most Cuban exiles consider unwise.

    The Castro brothers remain the longest lasting living dictators in the
    world — 54 years and counting. So far they have survived nine U.S.
    presidents, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the death of Hugo
    Chavez. According to them they have also survived numerous death plots
    emanating from the U.S., the failed Bay of Pigs invasion as well as the
    Kennedy/Khrushchev stare down in the 1962 October missile crisis.

    At the beginning of their reign of terror they executed thousands of
    freedom-loving patriots, confiscated (without compensation) all private
    property in the island — including billions of dollars of U.S.-owned
    assets — and launched the “Mariel boat exodus” during president Jimmy
    Carter’s tenure, releasing tens of thousands of Cubans from criminal
    jails and mental institutions and sending them over by boats to Miami
    and surrounding areas. Let’s not forget the downing of small private
    single engine planes killing in cold blood four American citizens during
    president Bill Clinton’s administration. To this day, they jail
    thousands of patriotic Cubans, including the well-known “Ladies in
    White,” whose only provocation has been to peacefully voice their
    objections to the treatment of the Cuban people.

    They have used the Cuban people as chattel sending their unwilling young
    men to fight and die in faraway lands (such as Angola); thousands of
    unsuspecting doctors to Venezuela and thousands others to forced labor
    camps to harvest sugar cane — all in return for financial resources to
    keep their ruthless regime afloat.

    They are listed as a terrorist country by our U.S. Department of State
    for good reason: they harbor terrorist leaders from the Middle East;
    train and supply intelligence officers to other ruthless governments
    such as Nicaragua and Bolivia; and are at the ideological epicenter of
    all efforts to undermine America and the values for which we stand.

    Many in our country on both sides of the aisle are second guessing our
    policies of the economic embargo and the restrictions imposed on our
    citizens regarding travel to Cuba. Some believe that a change in policy
    can become a catalytic event for meaningful change in Cuba and at the
    very least could be of financial benefit to U.S. commercial interests.
    They argue that an opening now can help a post-Castro Cuba evolve in a
    positive direction. The code word for all of these unilateral actions is
    “normalizing” relations.

    One of the rarest exceptions to U.S. historical diplomatic options is
    that these relations with Cuba were codified into American laws in 1991
    wherein the U.S. Congress determined that for the embargo to be lifted,
    Cuba needed to free its jails of political prisoners, agree to allow the
    formation of political organizations, and agree to hold elections at
    some point in the future.

    But, what is actually being proposed is that these conditions be
    unilaterally lifted. No reimbursement for U.S. business loses or return
    of valuable properties taken; no relief for the 11 million caged humans
    in Cuba’s archipelago and, in essence, a recognition that in spite of
    all of the above enumerated transgressions and many others, the United
    States has no beef with the Castro regime and is willing to let bygones
    be bygones. Why do that? How does that serve our interests?

    The Castro regime has no credit or resources with which to trade. If
    they did they could trade with every other nation they wish to — but
    can’t. And most importantly, they have no intention of discontinuing
    their destabilizing efforts in the hemisphere.

    Every time the free world has sought to extend a hand of friendship to
    world tyrants, they have lived to regret their actions. President Obama
    upon taking office sought to ease travel and remittances sent to Cuba as
    a gesture of good faith. The result? Jailing of an American — Alan Gross
    who was there on humanitarian efforts to work with the few remaining
    Jews on the island — and redoubling their efforts to undermine our
    interests in Latin America.

    Enter Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Secretary of State John
    Kerry. Secretary Hagel, while in the Senate, called the U.S. embargo
    “nonsensical” and anachronistic and Secretary Kerry shares similar
    views. No cabinet since the Carter administration has had such leaders
    in favor of rapprochement with the Castro brothers.

    But, after more than 50 years of exile, the Cuban diaspora remains
    strong. Its culture and memories passed on from generation to
    generation. More than one million Cuban expatriates and their children
    retain the fervor for their fatherland. Its been a remarkable journey in
    the America they – we — have all so fallen in love with. We have elected
    four Cuban-Americans to the U.S. Senate, several U.S. Representatives
    and literally dozens of state legislators throughout our land. We are
    also proud of our many corporate CEOs, athletes, artistic performers and
    successful professionals.

    One policy change which is favored by a growing segment of the Cuban
    exile community is the ending of our immigration accord and of the “wet
    foot dry foot” policies. These base their origins on the assumption that
    Cubans leaving the island for the United States are political refugees,
    fearing for their well-being at home and entitled to asylum in our
    country. However, far too many of our compatriots come and go regularly
    to the island to visit friends, relatives or to just vacation. That
    needs to stop and our immigration policies should treat my fellow Cubans
    as we do every one else regarding asylum entry and visa opportunities.

    Our views on relations with Castro’s Cuba remain firmly ensconced in our
    current policies regardless of our party affiliation. Our children were
    born here; our dead are buried here. America is our home but we yearn
    with fervor for the opportunity that our slaved brothers and sisters can
    someday soon enjoy the basic freedoms to which every human on earth is
    entitled. While I respect the different points of view of many inside of
    Cuba who have given up hope — after three generations of Castro rule –
    and seek different accommodations with the Castro regime, I believe that
    our current policies will best further our collective goal: a free Cuba.

    We need to be prepared, when the moment arises, to help with Cuba’s
    reconstruction, help end the suffering and bring freedom and hope to the
    millions awaiting the departure of the Castro brothers — sooner rather
    than later. Until that day comes, the United States should stay the
    course and our Secretaries of Defense and State need to be closely
    monitored by Congress.

    Al Cardenas, Chairman of the American Conservative Union and Cuban-American